LV
Luis V.Verified purchase
Your cart is empty
Add prompt packs to continue
Copy, paste and use them in your favorite AI:
Just $0.08 per prompt · one-time payment
100 resources included
Optimize your clinical and diagnostic practice with this definitive collection of prompts designed exclusively for the Gastroenterology specialist. This instructional engineering tool allows the generation of ultra-specific care protocols, precise endoscopic reports and personalized therapeutic plans, raising the standard of care in the digestive system. Each section has been structured under advanced instructional design principles to address everything from complex esophageal pathologies to cutting-edge biological pharmacology. Transform your medical workflow, reduce administrative burden, and ensure clinical decisions based on the latest evidence through the strategic use of specialized artificial intelligence.
He acts as an expert consultant in Pediatric Gastroenterology and Clinical Allergology, specialized in immune-mediated esophageal pathologies. Your goal is to develop a comprehensive clinical protocol and personalized management plan for a pediatric patient of [Patient Age] with suspected or confirmed diagnosis of Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE). The patient presents a clinical picture characterized by [Description of Symptoms: e.g. dysphagia to solids, substernal pain, food refusal or episodes of ballatilar impact] with an evolution of [Evolution Time]. First, it performs a critical analysis of current diagnostic findings. Evaluate the results of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy according to the EREFS scale (Edema, Rings, Exudates, Furrows and Stenosis) and correlate them with the histopathological report that reports a maximum count of [Number of Eosinophils per HPF] eosinophils per high power field in the distal esophagus and [Number of Eosinophils in Proximal Esophagus] in the proximal one. Determines whether the consensus criteria for the definitive diagnosis are met and rules out differential diagnoses such as non-responsive Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) or candida esophagitis. Subsequently, it designs a first-line therapeutic strategy adapted to the patient's profile. It compares three approaches in detail: 1) Proton Pump Inhibitor (PPI) Therapy at doses of [Proposed PPI Dose], 2) Swallowed topical corticosteroids such as viscous budesonide or fluticasone, and 3) Dietary intervention using [Diet Type: e.g. 6-food elimination diet or evidence-directed diet]. Analyze the pros and cons of each option based on the most recent scientific evidence (ESPGHAN/NASPGHAN guides) and the family logistics of [Family/Socioeconomic Environment]. Establish a rigorous follow-up schedule that includes scheduling control endoscopy to evaluate the histological response after [Number of Weeks] weeks of treatment. Defines what constitutes a 'histological remission' (e.g. <15 eos/hpf) and what steps to follow in the event of partial or no response. It includes a specific section on the prevention of long-term complications, such as esophageal remodeling and the formation of fibrostenting strictures, and whether in this particular case an initial esophageal dilation would be required under the criteria of [Endoscopic Severity Criteria]. Finally, it generates an executive summary aimed at the family and the multidisciplinary team (nutrition, psychology and pediatrics). This summary should explain the chronicity of EoE, the importance of treatment adherence despite symptomatic improvement, and the key milestones for food reintroduction if dietary therapy was chosen. Make sure the tone is professional, empathetic, and based strictly on precision medicine. If any key information needed to fill the bracketed fields is missing, ask me the necessary questions before answering.
Instant access after purchase from your dashboard. Just copy and paste into your AI.
ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, Grok, Qwen and any AI chat.
Yes. Every prompt includes bracketed fields where you insert your own information, context and specifics, so they fit your situation, country or industry.
Yes. Above you can read full sample prompts, exactly as you'll receive them, to check the quality before paying.
Yes. Pay once and they're yours forever, updates included.
He acts as an expert senior gastroenterologist with subspecialty in esophageal motility and functional digestive disorders. Your objective is to develop a differential diagnosis protocol and advanced therapeutic plan for a patient of [Patient age] years old who presents with persistent gastroesophageal reflux (refractory GERD) of [Evolution time] duration, despite strict compliance with double-dose PPI treatment. Begin the analysis by evaluating the patient's phenotyping based on the reported symptoms: [Symptoms: heartburn, regurgitation, chest pain, extraesophageal symptoms]. You must design a stepwise diagnostic algorithm that includes the relevance of performing an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with a biopsy protocol to rule out eosinophilic esophagitis, followed by high-resolution esophageal manometry to evaluate the esophagogastric junction and esophageal clearance, and a 24-hour pH-impedanciometry (specifies whether ON or OFF medication should be performed according to the context of [Previous findings]). Develop a detailed pharmacological optimization strategy, considering the change of PPI molecule, the use of potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs), and the addition of adjuvant therapies such as alginates, sucralfate or prokinetics in case of [Specific motor finding]. Additionally, it addresses the management of esophageal hypersensitivity through the use of neuromodulators (such as SSRIs, SNRIs or tricyclics at low doses) if functional studies suggest a physiological acid load but with a positive symptomatic association. Propose referral criteria for advanced surgical or endoscopic interventions, analyzing the pros and cons of Nissen fundoplication, the LINX system or transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) for this patient profile with [Risk Factors/Comorbidities]. It concludes with recommendations for evidence-based lifestyle changes and a clinical follow-up schedule to monitor response to the proposed treatment. If any key information needed to fill the bracketed fields is missing, ask me the necessary questions before answering.
He acts as an expert consultant in Gastroenterology and Thoracic Surgery with vast experience in the management of upper digestive tract emergencies. Your task is to provide a comprehensive analysis and clinical action plan for a Traumatic Esophageal Perforation case. This scenario represents one of the most critical surgical emergencies due to its potential to generate fulminant mediastinitis, sepsis, and high morbidity and mortality if the diagnosis is delayed more than 24 hours. To begin, process the following essential clinical information that the user will provide you: - Demographic profile and relevant comorbidities (e.g. cirrhosis, diabetes, motility disorders): [Patient profile] - Exact mechanism of injury (e.g. post-endoscopy/dilation iatrogenesis, accidental ingestion of a foreign body, penetrating trauma or blunt trauma): [Detailed mechanism] - Time of evolution from the incident to presentation (Determining factor for the prognosis): [Hours of evolution] - Findings on physical examination and hemodynamic stability (Presence of subcutaneous emphysema, Mackler's Triad, signs of SIRS): [Signs and symptoms] - Preliminary imaging results (chest X-ray, chest CT with oral contrast or esophagram): [Radiological findings] Your answer must be structured following these four pillars of evidence-based medicine: 1. Diagnosis and Classification: Confirms the precise anatomical location ([Location: Cervical, Thoracic or Abdominal]) and stratifies risk using the Pittsburgh Esophageal Perforation Severity Score. 2. Personalized Therapeutic Strategy: Determines whether the patient is a candidate for conservative management (according to Altorjay criteria), endoscopic approach (use of self-expanding metal stents, endoscopic clips or endoesophageal vacuum therapy) or urgent surgical intervention (primary repair with reinforcement patch or esophageal exclusion). 3. Management of Support and Complications: Defines the broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy scheme, the need for pleural/mediastinal drainage and the nutritional support plan (jejunostomy vs total parenteral nutrition). 4. Follow-up Criteria: Establishes the markers of clinical improvement and the milestones necessary to authorize the reintroduction of the oral route. The ultimate goal is to generate a highly accurate clinical decision guide that optimizes the medical team's workflow, minimizes surgical latency time, and provides specific recommendations on post-intervention monitoring to prevent long-term cicatricial fistulas or strictures. If any key information needed to fill the bracketed fields is missing, ask me the necessary questions before answering.
It's a master instruction, optimized for AI.
Prompt
your instruction
AI
Result
Based on 11 reviews
Exactly what I was looking for. They saved me hours of work in the first week. One hundred percent recommended.
It does the job, though I expected a bit more. Some prompts are great and others more generic. Could be better but useful.
Exactly what I was looking for. They're easy to adapt to my case by just changing the fields. I'll buy again without hesitation.
Good value for money. They adapt well with a few tweaks. I recommend it.
Best purchase I made this month. They're easy to adapt to my case by just changing the fields. Already recommended them to my team.
Worth every penny. They're easy to adapt to my case by just changing the fields. Already recommended them to my team.
I didn't expect them to be this complete. They're easy to adapt to my case by just changing the fields. An investment that pays for itself.
Best purchase I made this month. The quality of the answers I get improved a lot. One hundred percent recommended.
Best purchase I made this month. They're easy to adapt to my case by just changing the fields. I'll buy again without hesitation.
I didn't expect them to be this complete. The index is organized and I find what I need instantly. I'll buy again without hesitation.
Happy with the purchase. The organization helps you get oriented fast. I recommend it.