BV
Bruna V.
Your cart is empty
Add prompt packs to continue
Copy, paste and use them in your favorite AI:
Just $0.08 per prompt · one-time payment
100 resources included
This collection represents the standard of excellence for the alternative dispute resolution professional. Each prompt has been designed using advanced instructional design principles to transform artificial intelligence into a legal consultant and strategic mediator capable of addressing the most complex tensions in the extrajudicial environment. Through this system, the user will be able to structure armored clauses, manage emotional crises with psychological precision and ensure the legal validity of each agreement. It is the definitive tool to maximize efficiency in conciliation hearings, reducing writing times and increasing the technical rigor of the results achieved.
He acts as an expert in psychology applied to conflict resolution and senior mediator with more than 20 years of experience in extrajudicial conciliation. Your objective is to design an immediate tactical intervention to manage an episode of reactive frustration during an active conciliation hearing between [Party A] and [Party B] regarding a [Nature of Conflict] conflict. Reactive frustration is manifested at this time by [Describe behavior: yelling, aggressive body language, cognitive blocks, or personal attacks]. Analyze the situation from the perspective of affective neuroscience, identifying the 'threat' triggers that have activated the limbic system of the parties. You should propose an intervention script that uses 'strategic empathic validation' and 'positive reframing' techniques to de-escalate tension immediately. The tone should be assertive, professional, calm and neutral, ensuring that neither party feels judged or invalidated in their primary emotion. Develop the response by structuring it in three critical phases: 1. Containment (assisted breathing techniques or tactical pauses), 2. Normalization of the emotion (explaining why it is natural to feel this way without validating the aggression), and 3. Redirection towards interests (moving from the emotional complaint to the underlying need). It includes literal phrases that the conciliator must pronounce to regain control of the audience without breaking rapport. Finally, it provides a brief guide to 'Emotional Hygiene for the Conciliator' that details how the professional should manage his or her own reactivity to the frustration of others, applying the technique of [Self-Regulation Technique] to avoid emotional contagion and maintain the impartiality necessary for the success of the conciliation act. If any key information needed to fill the bracketed fields is missing, ask me the necessary questions before answering.
Instant access after purchase from your dashboard. Just copy and paste into your AI.
ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, Grok, Qwen and any AI chat.
Yes. Every prompt includes bracketed fields where you insert your own information, context and specifics, so they fit your situation, country or industry.
Yes. Above you can read full sample prompts, exactly as you'll receive them, to check the quality before paying.
Yes. Pay once and they're yours forever, updates included.
He acts as an expert legal consultant and senior mediator specialized in Civil Liability and Extrajudicial Conciliation. Your main objective is to comprehensively advise me on the structuring of a technical and legal proposal for the claim for compensation for material damage derived from [Describe the specific incident or loss, e.g.: vehicular collision, moisture damage, machinery breakage]. The approach should be aimed at peaceful resolution of the conflict in a conciliation hearing, maximizing the chances of a quick and fair agreement. First analyze the causal relationship based on the following narrative of events: [Insert detailed chronology of the event]. It is essential that you identify the elements of civil liability present: the illegality, the damage caused, the causal link and the attribution factor. Evaluate whether there are defenses of liability that the other party could claim, such as sole fault of the victim or fortuitous act, and be prepared to refute such arguments based on the available evidence. Second, develop a detailed quantification of the damage. To do this, use the information provided on [List of affected assets and their estimated value]. You must break down compensation into two fundamental categories: 1) Consequential Damage, which includes the replacement value of the goods or the cost of necessary repairs; and 2) Lost Profits, if the affected asset generated income or economic benefit that has ceased to be received (e.g. cargo transport vehicle). Applies criteria of proportionality and reasonableness according to the regulations of [Country or Jurisdiction]. Third, draft a 'Proposal for a Settlement Agreement'. This document must be written in technical but conciliatory language. It must include a background section, the total amount sought, payment facilities (if applicable), and a 'Peace and Safe' clause specifying that, once payment has been made, all obligations and legal actions derived from the aforementioned fact are extinguished. Make sure that the document meets the formal standards of an extrajudicial conciliation document. Finally, generate a negotiation guide for the audience. Provide me with three possible scenarios: the optimal scenario (immediate full payment), the intermediate scenario (fractional payment with interest) and the breakup scenario (lack of agreement and judicial proceedings). For each scenario, tell me which points are negotiable and which are essential to protect my assets, based on the solvency of the debtor: [Information on the solvency of the deceased if known]. If any key information needed to fill the bracketed fields is missing, ask me the necessary questions before answering.
He acts as an expert legal consultant and technical expert specialized in Extrajudicial Conciliation processes with extensive experience in ensuring the legal effectiveness of complex agreements. Your objective is to draft an exhaustive technical annex that will be attached to a Conciliation Minute, guaranteeing that the technical terms are clear, measurable and enforceable in the event of eventual non-compliance in court. The annex should focus on the 'Legal Effectiveness of the Agreement' section to avoid ambiguities that could lead to nullification or misinterpretation by a judge. To begin, analyze the following basic information: The conflict is about [Matter of the Agreement, e.g. Non-compliance with civil works or Intellectual Property], involving [Name of the Parties]. The main agreement establishes obligations to give, do or not to do that require surgical technical precision. It is imperative that this annex translates the will of the parties into technical specifications that leave no room for reasonable doubt, following the standards of the [Applicable Technical Regulations]. Write the body of the annex including the following sections: 1. Glossary of technical terms (precise definitions for the context of the agreement); 2. Detailed specifications of the object (dimensions, qualities, standards [ISO/NTP/Others]); 3. Technical compliance schedule with verifiable milestones [Critical Dates]; and 4. Verification and reception protocol (exact procedure to consider the obligation fulfilled, including [Field Tests or Necessary Certifications]). The document ends with a technical safeguard clause that stipulates that, in the event of a discrepancy between the general narrative of the Conciliation Record and this annex, the technical specificity described here will prevail for purposes of forced execution. Make sure that the language is formal, professional and strictly aligned with the principles of legal certainty and literality required in the judicial executive route. Use the legal framework of [Country/Jurisdiction] as a reference. If any key information needed to fill the bracketed fields is missing, ask me the necessary questions before answering.
It's a master instruction, optimized for AI.
Prompt
your instruction
AI
Result
Based on 11 reviews
It does the job, though I expected a bit more. They work as a starting point. Could be better but useful.
I didn't expect them to be this complete. They saved me hours of work in the first week. I'll buy again without hesitation.
I was impressed by the quality. The prompts are really well thought out and the effort shows. Totally recommend them.
I didn't expect them to be this complete. The quality of the answers I get improved a lot. One hundred percent recommended.
Exceeded my expectations. They work just as well in ChatGPT and Claude. Totally recommend them.
Best purchase I made this month. They saved me hours of work in the first week. I'll buy again without hesitation.
Exceeded my expectations. They work just as well in ChatGPT and Claude. Already recommended them to my team.
Happy with the purchase. The prompts are useful and practical. I'd buy again.
Very good material. Most of them worked on the first try. I recommend it.
Worth every penny. The prompts are really well thought out and the effort shows. One hundred percent recommended.
I didn't expect them to be this complete. The quality of the answers I get improved a lot. An investment that pays for itself.