MH
Miguel H.Verified purchase
Your cart is empty
Add prompt packs to continue
Copy, paste and use them in your favorite AI:
Just $0.08 per prompt · one-time payment
100 resources included
Maximize your competitiveness in the state market with this engineering collection of prompts designed to optimize each phase of public procurement. This tool transforms the complexity of regulations and administrative processes into a strategic operational advantage, allowing suppliers and officials to draft technical documentation with surgical precision and full legal compliance. Optimize your tender lifecycle, from initial planning to contract settlement, by using artificial intelligence. This collection ensures impeccable structuring of proposals, efficient risk management and solid legal defense, guaranteeing that each document generated meets the most demanding standards of transparency and administrative efficiency.
He acts as a Senior Legal Consultant specialized in State Contracting and Administrative Law, with extensive experience in defending bidders against arbitrary decisions by selection committees. Your objective is to draft a technical and legally protected appeal against the act of disqualification of the offer presented by [Name of your Company] within the framework of the selection procedure [Number and Name of the Selection Procedure], convened by [Name of the Public Entity]. The disqualification has been wrongly based on [Describe the cause of disqualification invoked by the entity], alleging an alleged non-compliance with [Refer to the specific section of the bases or technical requirement]. In the first section, it develops an exhaustive analysis of the Factual Background. It details how the offer presented rigorously complied with the Minimum Technical Requirements (RTM) and how the selection committee has incurred a restrictive or erroneous interpretation of the documentation provided. It is imperative to highlight that the document [Name of the questioned document or certificate] contains all the information required in the administrative bases, and that any doubt about its scope should have been clarified under the principle of effectiveness and not through a direct elimination of the bidder. Develops a solid legal argument focused on the violation of the Principles of Public Procurement, specifically the Principle of Freedom of Competition, the Principle of Transparency and the Principle of Truthfulness. You must mention that disqualification constitutes an excess of formal rigor that goes against the public purpose of the process, which is to select the most advantageous offer for the State. It argues that, if there was a non-substantial omission, the entity was obliged to apply the power to correct material errors in accordance with the regulations in force in [User's Country], instead of proceeding with immediate disqualification. It includes a section on Technical-Legal Support where the interpretation of the entity is distorted. If the disqualification is due to an alleged lack of experience or non-compliance with a technical specification, demonstrate through [Cite Technical Standards, Catalogs or Certifications] that the component offered is equivalent or superior to what was requested. It uses an assertive tone to point out that the actions of the selection committee lack the proper motivation of the administrative act, which generates an annulment due to a defect in the procedure by not having objectively evaluated the means of proof delivered in the technical envelope. It ends with a formal and structured Petition where the competent authority (Contracting Court or Head of the Entity) is requested to revoke the disqualification act, declare the validity of the offer from [Name of your Company] and proceed with the award of the contract. Make sure that the closing includes mention of the reservation of additional legal actions in case the violation of the bidder's rights persists. The language should be technical, sophisticated, and structured for high-level legal review. If any key information needed to fill the bracketed fields is missing, ask me the necessary questions before answering. Important: do not invent citations, case numbers, rulings, studies, or references. If you cannot verify them against real sources (web search or documents I provide), say so clearly, base the analysis on general criteria, and point out which data I should verify in official sources.
Instant access after purchase from your dashboard. Just copy and paste into your AI.
ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, Grok, Qwen and any AI chat.
Yes. Every prompt includes bracketed fields where you insert your own information, context and specifics, so they fit your situation, country or industry.
Yes. Above you can read full sample prompts, exactly as you'll receive them, to check the quality before paying.
Yes. Pay once and they're yours forever, updates included.
He acts as a Senior Consultant Specialist in State Contracting and Quality Management, with extensive experience in the development of technical requirements for the public sector. Your mission is to write an exhaustive and technical section titled 'Compliance with Mandatory National Technical Regulations' for the contracting process of [Name of Good or Service]. The objective is to legally shield the process, ensuring that the supplier complies with all current standards that guarantee the quality, safety and functionality of the object of the contract. To develop this section, you must carry out an in-depth research and regulatory synthesis that covers the following pillars: 1) National Technical Regulations: Identify and cite the specific regulations in force in [Country] that are mandatory for the marketing or provision of [Name of the Good or Service]. 2) Mandatory National Technical Standards (NTN): Clearly differentiates those standards that, by resolution of the quality governing body, have become mandatory for the State. 3) Certifications of Surveillance and Control Agencies: Details the health, environmental or safety records, licenses or authorizations that must be current (e.g. [Health Entity], [Environmental Protection Entity], [Industrial Safety Entity]). The content must be structured with absolute technical rigor. For each identified rule or regulation, you must provide: a) The exact alphanumeric code and its last update; b) The specific scope of the standard applied to the requirement; c) The accreditation method (if compliance is demonstrated by a product conformity certificate, accredited laboratory test report, sworn statement or technical inspection). It is vital that you include an 'Automatic Regulatory Update' clause that establishes that, in the event that a rule is repealed or modified during the selection process or contractual execution, the most recent current rule that replaces it will apply. Finally, it organizes all the information in a technical regulatory compliance matrix that will serve as an annex for the evaluation of offers. This matrix must separate the requirements that are 'Remediable' from those that are 'Non-Remediable' (Admission Requirements), technically justifying why non-compliance with certain mandatory national technical regulations would automatically disqualify the bidder for representing a risk to the public entity or the end user. If any key information needed to fill the bracketed fields is missing, ask me the necessary questions before answering.
Acts as a Senior Consultant expert in Public Procurement and Corporate Sustainability. Your primary objective is to design a detailed technical methodology and a scoring table for the 'Social Sustainability Factors' section that will form part of the Technical Evaluation Criteria in a public tender for [Type of Work, Good or Service]. The design must be robust, objective, auditable and aligned with Sustainable Public Procurement (SPP) policies to ensure that the selected suppliers generate a real positive social impact in [Geographical Location of the Project]. Develop specific criteria that award additional points to bidders who demonstrate a superior commitment to equity and human development. You must propose at least four dimensions of evaluation: 1. Effective labor inclusion of vulnerable populations (people with disabilities, young people without previous experience, or groups at risk of exclusion). 2. Verifiable gender equality policies, including zero pay gap and the presence of women in senior management positions. 3. Knowledge transfer and technical training programs for the local community in the area of direct influence. 4. International social responsibility certifications (such as ISO 26000 or B Corp Certification) that validate your internal processes. For each proposed factor, structure the response as follows: A) Name of the evaluation criterion. B) Score assigned within the technical scale (out of a total of [Maximum Score of the Social Section]). C) Technical description of the minimum requirement to qualify. D) Mandatory evidentiary documentation (e.g. extracts from social security returns from the last 6 months, external audit certificates, sustainability reports). E) Scoring methodology (e.g. linear assignment, by compliance thresholds or binary 'pass/fail' system with weighting). Finally, it includes a 'Post-Award Verification Clauses' section that ensures that the selected supplier maintains these social standards throughout the execution of the contract with the State. Ensure that these factors do not constitute disproportionate barriers to entry that limit competition, but rather incentives aligned with the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the current legislation of [Country/Region]. The final result must be a technical document ready to be integrated into the specifications or bases of the call. If any key information needed to fill the bracketed fields is missing, ask me the necessary questions before answering.
It's a master instruction, optimized for AI.
Prompt
your instruction
AI
Result
BID APPEAL — bidder [Name] 1. Challenged act · Disqualification at the technical evaluation stage 2. Grounds · Breach of the non-discrimination principle · Requirement not set out in the final terms 3. Petition · Partial annulment and reinstatement of the proposal
··· the full result continues ···
Based on 11 reviews
I was impressed by the quality. They work just as well in ChatGPT and Claude. Totally recommend them.
Exceeded my expectations. They saved me hours of work in the first week. I'll buy again without hesitation.
Very good material. They saved me time on several tasks. I'd buy again.
Happy with the purchase. They saved me time on several tasks. Came close to a five.
Best purchase I made this month. The quality of the answers I get improved a lot. Totally recommend them.
Very good material. They adapt well with a few tweaks. I recommend it.
I was impressed by the quality. They work just as well in ChatGPT and Claude. Totally recommend them.
Good value for money. They saved me time on several tasks. I recommend it.
Exceeded my expectations. The index is organized and I find what I need instantly. An investment that pays for itself.
I was impressed by the quality. They work just as well in ChatGPT and Claude. I'll buy again without hesitation.
Good value for money. They saved me time on several tasks. Good option.