Your cart is empty
Add prompt packs to continue
Copy, paste and use them in your favorite AI:
Just $0.08 per prompt · one-time payment
100 resources included
This engineering collection of prompts represents the cutting edge in supporting contemporary university teaching. Designed under rigorous instructional design standards, each tool has been optimized to enhance research productivity, classroom excellence, and high-level academic management. It is the definitive resource for the professor seeking to lead the transition towards an academy driven by artificial intelligence without sacrificing scientific rigor. By integrating these prompts, the teacher will be able to automate complex administrative tasks and focus on the creation of meaningful knowledge. The structure ranges from epistemological surveillance to the management of international funds, providing comprehensive coverage of the challenges of the current university ecosystem. This collection not only optimizes time, but also raises the technical quality of publications, syllabi, and undergraduate tutoring processes.
He acts as a Senior Consultant Specialized in Technology Transfer and Scientific-Academic Financing with extensive experience in the interface between academia and the productive sector. Your objective is to design a comprehensive transfer strategy and a funding roadmap for the research project titled [Name of Research Project], which is developed within the framework of the faculty of [Name of Faculty] of the institution [Name of University]. The project is currently at a technological maturity level [Current TRL Level: 1 to 9] and seeks to address the technical/social challenge of [Brief description of the problem]. Identify and exhaustively analyze calls for competitive funds, both national and international (such as Horizon Europe-type programs, grants from national science agencies or seed capital funds for spin-offs), that are relevant to the [Knowledge Area] area. For each identified funding source, specify the key evaluation criteria, the fundable items, and how the project should align its research objectives with the strategic priorities of the funding entity. Be sure to propose an application schedule that maximizes the likelihood of obtaining resources in the prototyping and validation phases. Develop a protection plan for intangible assets and intellectual property adapted to this case, evaluating whether the best route is [IP Strategy: Patent, Utility Model, Industrial Secret or Copyright]. Defines the steps necessary to establish a transfer office or manage the relationship with the university's OTL, detailing how the benefits would be distributed and what the most appropriate transfer mechanisms would be: [Mechanism: Licensing to third parties, Creation of Spin-off or Strategic Alliance]. It describes the technical milestones that must be met to attract private investment after the public funds phase. Finally, write an 'Impact and Transferability' section with persuasive and technical language, specifically designed to be included in an application form for applied research funds. This section should highlight the social return on investment (SROI), the competitive advantage of the technology compared to existing solutions in the market of [Country or Region of Impact] and the scalability of the proposed model. Include a risk matrix where you identify possible barriers to transfer and the corresponding mitigation strategies. If any key information needed to fill the bracketed fields is missing, ask me the necessary questions before answering.
Instant access after purchase from your dashboard. Just copy and paste into your AI.
ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, Grok, Qwen and any AI chat.
Yes. Every prompt includes bracketed fields where you insert your own information, context and specifics, so they fit your situation, country or industry.
Yes. Above you can read full sample prompts, exactly as you'll receive them, to check the quality before paying.
Yes. Pay once and they're yours forever, updates included.
He acts as an expert in epistemological surveillance and auditing of doctoral-level scientific research. Your mission is to carefully break down the methodological rigor of the following document or proposal: [Title or fragment of the study]. You must operate under a lens of academic skepticism, seeking to identify gaps, inconsistencies and, above all, biases that may invalidate inferences presented in the context of university education and high-impact scientific production. Start by analyzing the research design and sampling frame. Evaluate whether the selection method ([Sampling: Random, convenience, snowball, etc.]) introduces a selection bias that limits the generalization of the results to the target population. Examines whether the sample size is statistically significant for the desired [Level of confidence or margin of error] and whether confounding variables that could distort the causality or correlation relationship in the phenomenon studied have been adequately considered. Second, it delves into measurement and procedural bias. Analyze the instruments used ([Name of instruments or collection techniques]) and question their construct validity and reliability. Is there evidence of experimenter bias, social desirability effects on participants, or external influences during data collection in the [Data Collection Context] setting? Evaluate whether the collection protocol was robust enough to minimize both random error and systematic error. Finally, it performs a critical evaluation of interpretation and reporting bias. Determine if the data analysis ([Type of analysis: ANOVA, Regression, Content Analysis, etc.]) is appropriate for the nature of the variables and the objectives set. Identify if there are signs of 'p-hacking', selective omission of non-significant results or a narrative that forces the conclusion towards [Pre-established hypothesis or theory]. Deliver a technical report that categorizes the biases found according to their severity (Critical, Moderate, Mild) and proposes specific corrective actions to raise the quality standard and transparency of the research. If any key information needed to fill the bracketed fields is missing, ask me the necessary questions before answering.
He acts as an expert in Editorial Management and Scientific Visibility with extensive experience in optimizing digital identity for researchers in the field of higher education. Your primary objective is to comprehensively advise a [Name of Researcher] in the configuration, debugging, synchronization and strategic maintenance of their ORCID (Open Researcher and Contributor ID) profile to maximize the impact and traceability of their academic production linked to the [Name of the University or Institution]. First, perform a detailed audit of basic profile information. Make sure that the researcher's name is standardized according to international scientific signature standards to avoid ambiguities in databases. Write the 'Biography' section in a professional and persuasive manner, integrating the main lines of research corresponding to [Areas of Knowledge], highlighting the most relevant academic milestones and strategically using [Keywords in English and Spanish] to facilitate indexing by global search engines such as Google Scholar and institutional repositories. Secondly, it develops a technical protocol for automated synchronization of scientific production. Guides the user in bi-directional linking of their ORCID account with key databases such as Scopus (Author ID), Web of Science (ResearcherID) and regional registries such as [Mention other local registries, for example: Dialnet or CVN]. Explains in detail how to use the 'Search & Link' wizards (Crossref Metadata Search, DataCite, Europe PubMed Central) to massively and accurately import the metadata of the articles, books and book chapters found in [List of Publications or link to CV]. Subsequently, focus on the interoperability of the profile within the Editorial Management flow. It describes how the researcher should use their ORCID iD during the submission process on platforms such as OJS or ScholarOne, ensuring that authorship credit is assigned correctly and that publication metadata is automatically updated through recognition by Trusted Organizations. Includes specific recommendations for managing data privacy and public visibility of each section. Finally, design a semiannual maintenance plan that includes the systematic review of duplicate records, the updating of research projects funded by [Financing Entity] and the incorporation of validated peer review merits ('Peer Review'). Provides a roadmap with three critical actions to transform the ORCID profile from a simple static repository into an academic marketing tool that connects teachers with international scientific collaboration networks and improves their positioning in the [Interest Ranking]. If any key information needed to fill the bracketed fields is missing, ask me the necessary questions before answering.
It's a master instruction, optimized for AI.
Prompt
your instruction
AI
Result
Based on 9 reviews
I was impressed by the quality. The index is organized and I find what I need instantly. I'll buy again without hesitation.
I was impressed by the quality. The prompts are really well thought out and the effort shows. An investment that pays for itself.
Decent for the price. I had to tweak them quite a bit for my case. Could be better but useful.
I didn't expect them to be this complete. The index is organized and I find what I need instantly. Already recommended them to my team.
Very good material. The prompts are useful and practical. Came close to a five.
Decent for the price. I had to tweak them quite a bit for my case. Acceptable.
Best purchase I made this month. They're easy to adapt to my case by just changing the fields. An investment that pays for itself.
I didn't expect them to be this complete. The index is organized and I find what I need instantly. Already recommended them to my team.
Exactly what I was looking for. The index is organized and I find what I need instantly. One hundred percent recommended.