MA
Mariana A.Verified purchase
Your cart is empty
Add prompt packs to continue
Copy, paste and use them in your favorite AI:
Just $0.08 per prompt · one-time payment
100 resources included
This definitive collection of prompts for journalists and reporters has been designed to radically transform the modern editorial workflow. Through an advanced instructional architecture, each prompt allows the communication professional to increase the depth of their research, optimize the writing of immersive chronicles and master the algorithms of social networks with high-impact headlines. It is the essential tool for those seeking to lead the information narrative in a data-saturated environment. The value of this set lies in its hyper-specialization. From document forensics to creating viral threads with surgical precision, this collection covers all facets of contemporary journalism. By integrating these prompts into their daily routine, the reporter not only saves critical writing time, but also guarantees a higher quality standard, maintaining the ethical rigor and dynamism necessary to capture the attention of today's audiences.
He acts as a fact-checking expert and investigative journalist specialized in detecting digital disinformation. Your mission is to dismantle and discredit in a scientific, logical and documentary manner the viral rumor titled [Name of Rumor or Suspicious News] that is currently circulating on [Platforms: Twitter, WhatsApp, TikTok, etc.]. You must follow a rigorous OSINT (Open Source Intelligence) methodology and cross-verification to provide a technical report that serves as the basis for a professional press article. First, perform an analysis of the anatomy of the rumor. Identify 'Patient Zero' or the earliest detectable source of origin, analyzing whether it comes from an automated account (bot), a misinterpreted satirical profile or a targeted propaganda source. Evaluate the emotional triggers that are facilitating its viralization, such as fear, indignation or false urgency, and describe how these cognitive biases are clouding the judgment of the target audience in [Geographic or Social Context]. Second, execute a process of contrasting evidence. For each statement contained in the rumor, look for direct evidence in [Official Sources, International Organizations or Specific Databases]. If the rumor includes multimedia material (images or videos), describe the reverse search and metadata analysis procedure you would perform to confirm whether the material has been edited, taken out of context, or generated by artificial intelligence (Deepfake). It is crucial that you point out any chronological or logical discrepancies between the real events and the viral narrative. Finally, write a categorized veracity verdict (False, Misleading, Lacking Context, or Unverifiable) and structure a 'Point by Point' breakdown that refutes the rumor's premises. Include a 'Hard Facts' section that the journalist can quote directly and suggest three high-authority sources that support the true version of events. The tone should be neutral, pedagogical and strictly based on digital forensic evidence, avoiding subjective value judgments. If any key information needed to fill the bracketed fields is missing, ask me the necessary questions before answering.
Instant access after purchase from your dashboard. Just copy and paste into your AI.
ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, Grok, Qwen and any AI chat.
Yes. Every prompt includes bracketed fields where you insert your own information, context and specifics, so they fit your situation, country or industry.
Yes. Above you can read full sample prompts, exactly as you'll receive them, to check the quality before paying.
Yes. Pay once and they're yours forever, updates included.
He acts as an editor-in-chief of the data journalism section in a prestigious international media outlet. Your primary mission is to transform complex databases and dry metrics into a high-impact journalistic narrative through a comprehensive "Historical Data Comparison." The analysis should focus on the evolution of [Main Variable: e.g. Wage inequality, CO2 emissions, Housing prices] covering the specific time range from [Start Year] to [End Year]. The first step of your analysis involves identifying statistical anomalies and critical turning points. Don't just describe whether the numbers increased or decreased; Identify the exact moment when the trend changed trajectory and correlate it with possible external milestones in the context of [Country or Region]. It is imperative that you use precision journalism techniques to compare values, ensuring that factors such as inflation, demographic changes or methodological reforms do not distort the interpretation of historical reality. In the writing phase, your language should be accessible but mathematically rigorous. For each technical metric or standard deviation mentioned, you must include a "translation to reality": if you talk about an increase of [X] units, compare it with an everyday reference known as [Scale Reference: e.g. The size of a city, the budget of a ministry, or the capacity of a stadium]. The objective is for the average reader to visualize the magnitude of the historical change without needing to be an expert in statistics or econometrics. Structure the final report as follows: 1) An impact headline that summarizes the most counterintuitive finding of the comparison. 2) An executive summary with the 3 'key findings'. 3) Three titled deep analysis blocks that break down the evolution of [Metric A], [Metric B], and [Metric C]. 4) A 'Human Context' section where you explain how this cold data affected daily life in the period analyzed. 5) A prospective conclusion that uses the historical trend to propose future scenarios in [Current Context]. Finally, be sure to caution against the limitations of the original data and maintain a tone of unwavering analytical objectivity. If you detect a significant correlation, always clarify that it does not necessarily imply causation, citing possible confounding variables. The result should be a publication-ready report that combines the depth of an academic report with the agility and hook of modern digital journalism. If any key information needed to fill the bracketed fields is missing, ask me the necessary questions before answering.
He acts as a senior consultant in political communication and expert in critical discourse analysis specialized in investigative journalism. Your objective is to design a dialectical interrogation strategy to systematically dismantle [Name of Politician]'s evasion tactics in relation to the [Controversial Issue/Scandal] case. I need you to analyze the subject's previous verbal behavior to identify their habitual patterns of 'pivoting' (diversion of attention), 'bridging' (use of bridging phrases) and 'bureaucratic glossolalia' (use of empty technicalities) to avoid accountability to public opinion. First, develop a battery of questions based on the 'reverse logical funnel' technique. You must begin with factual and irrefutable premises extracted from [Contradictory Data or Specific Document], forcing the interviewee to accept partial truths that, at the end of the sequence, leave him without an argument solution when faced with a question with a binary closure. Each question must be shielded against standard crisis manual answers, anticipating that the politician will try to take refuge in the rhetoric of [Ideology or Party]. Prepare an immediate response for each possible deviation, maintaining focus on the administrative and legal responsibility of the position held by the individual. Second, design a 'systematic questioning' protocol that uses strategic silence and persistent reframing. If the interviewee offers an evasive answer, the prompt must generate three levels of insistence: a polite reminder of the original question, a public exposure of the contradiction detected in his answer, and finally, a confrontation of hard data that invalidates his premise. It includes recommendations on the management of microexpressions and the control of speaking times to prevent the politician from taking control of the pace of the conversation, suggesting deliberate pauses after each response that is insufficient to generate discomfort that forces him to expand his statement. Finally, prepare a map of rhetorical contingencies for the three most probable outcomes of [Name of Politician]: victimization before the press, the appeal to technical complexity and the 'ad hominem' attack on the medium. For each scenario, draft a neutralizing response that redirects attention to [Specific Conflict], ensuring that the end result is an interview scheme that prioritizes obtaining substantive information over narrative fluency or excessive institutional politeness. If any key information needed to fill the bracketed fields is missing, ask me the necessary questions before answering.
It's a master instruction, optimized for AI.
Prompt
your instruction
AI
Result
Based on 5 reviews
I didn't expect them to be this complete. They're easy to adapt to my case by just changing the fields. An investment that pays for itself.
Exactly what I was looking for. The index is organized and I find what I need instantly. One hundred percent recommended.
Happy with the purchase. They saved me time on several tasks. Good option.
Best purchase I made this month. They saved me hours of work in the first week. Totally recommend them.
Exceeded my expectations. The index is organized and I find what I need instantly. Already recommended them to my team.