Your cart is empty
Add prompt packs to continue
Elevate your clinical practice to a master's level with this definitive collection of AI prompts designed exclusively for couples therapy specialists. This comprehensive resource combines the scientific precision of the Gottman Method with the emotional depth of Emotionally Focused Therapy (EFT), providing immediate intervention tools for the most complex contemporary relationship challenges. Optimize your management time, refine your diagnoses, and develop personalized treatment plans that address everything from infidelity to sexual desire disparity. Whether you operate in a physical clinic or in a virtual environment, these prompts will allow you to automate administrative and marketing processes, allowing you to focus exclusively on what matters: the transformation and healing of your patients' relationships.
100 resources included
He acts as a clinical psychologist specialized in couples therapy with advanced certification in the Gottman Method. Your task is to write a comprehensive and professional 'Couple Strengths Report' for the couple made up of [Name Member 1] and [Name Member 2]. This report should be based on the principles of the 'House of Solid Relationship' and focus exclusively on the functional aspects, internal resources and resilience mechanisms detected during the diagnostic evaluation phase. The goal is to provide clinical validation that serves as a basis for therapeutic growth. Start by analyzing the base of the pyramid: the Love Maps. Use the data provided on [Level of mutual knowledge] to highlight how the couple maintains an active curiosity about each other's internal world. Highlight specific examples where they demonstrate understanding of the partner's aspirations, concerns, and joys, validating their ability to remain cognitively connected despite the passage of time and life transitions such as [Significant Couple Events]. Explain why this foundation is essential for your long-term stability. Continue with the system of Affection and Admiration. Based on [Positive Affect and Gratitude Score], describe in detail how the couple expresses appreciation and respect for each other. Identify the 'little moments' they reported during the oral history interview, such as [Examples of positive interactions and rituals], and explain from a clinical perspective how these constant deposits in the 'Emotional Bank Account' act as a relational immunity system. You should emphasize the absence of contempt and the presence of a culture of appreciation that sustains your friendship. Discusses conflict management, specifically the ability to 'Accept Influence' and the use of 'Softening the Start' in conversations. Based on [Data on conflict management and de-escalation], write an analysis of your ability to repair after a disagreement. Do not focus on the origin of the conflict, but on the strength of their repair process: How do they achieve a return to calm? Mention your ability to use humor, affection, or genuine apologies during stressful times, if supported by [In-Session Interaction Observations] data. Finally, it integrates the 'Shared Meaning and Meaning Creation' section. Explore how your individual and joint goals, detailed in [Shared Values, Dreams, and Legacies], create a unique and transcendent couple culture. The report concludes with a synthesis of its 'Resilience Forecast', validating its mutual commitment and offering a hopeful vision based on the scientific evidence of the Gottman Method. The tone should be professional, empowering, warm and highly analytical, structured in a way that the couple can read it and feel deeply understood in their relational health.
He acts as an expert systemic therapist with advanced certification in the Gottman Method. Your primary objective is to facilitate the clinical exercise of 'Dreams in Conflict' to address a persistent gridlock detected in [Partner's Name] relationship. The specific dispute that keeps them in a cycle of negativity is [Brief description of the recurring conflict]. You must guide this analysis from Dr. Gottman's fundamental premise: all stagnant conflict is rooted in dreams, values, or life aspirations that have not been honored, or that feel deeply threatened by the other's position. Your mission is to unravel what lies beneath the surface of this technical or logistical dispute. Don't analyze the problem from traditional problem solving; focus exclusively on the deep meaning. For [Name of Member A], explore how your stance on [Brief description of recurring conflict] links to your sense of identity, security, freedom, or belonging. Repeat this analysis for [Name of Member B], looking for the roots of his resistance. The therapeutic objective is not to reach an immediate agreement, but to manage to 'move from stagnation to dialogue' by understanding and validating the partner's dream. Structure your technical response into five diagnostic phases: 1. Diagnosis of Stagnation (Identify which 'Four Horsemen' are most prevalent in this dynamic). 2. Exploration of Symbolic Meaning (What does this theme represent for each person on an existential level?). 3. Mapping the History and Genealogy of the Conflict (Connect current positions with the [historical context of the couple] and their experiences of origin). 4. Definition of the Central 'Dream' (Describes the non-negotiable value that each member is trying to protect). 5. Suggested Intervention Protocol (Provides 5 deep probing questions that the therapist should use to facilitate mutual validation). Use a clinical, empathetic and highly analytical tone. Be sure to provide a perspective that allows the couple to see that the 'enemy' is not the spouse, but the stagnation itself caused by the collision of two valid but unexpressed dreams. It includes recommendations on how to manage the 'physiological flood' (diffuse physiological arousal) that usually occurs during this type of highly emotionally charged sessions, suggesting specific self-regulation techniques for the profile of this couple.
He acts as an expert Couples Therapist, certified in the Gottman Method, specialized in the Diagnostic Evaluation phase. Your goal is to analyze a detailed record of everyday interactions to identify the strength of the 'Affection and Admiration' system and the positivity ratio (the Magic Ratio of 5:1) within [Couple's Names] relationship. This analysis will focus specifically on 'Bids for Connection' and how each member of the couple responds to them (Towards, Against or Away). You must process the information provided about [Context of the week or period of registration] to determine if the couple is actively building 'Love Maps' and if there is a predominance of the 'Positive Perspective' over the 'Diffuse Negative Feeling'. For each interaction recorded in the [Document name or record description] file, perform a technical breakdown that includes: 1. Identification of the Connection Attempt (verbal or non-verbal). 2. Observed response (Towards, Against, Away). 3. Classification within the pillars of Gottman's 'House of Solid Relationship'. 4. Evaluation of the level of 'Affection and Admiration' expressed explicitly. Subsequently, generate an initial diagnostic report that quantifies the proportion of positive interactions versus negative ones during this evaluation period. If the ratio is less than 5:1 in times of calm or 0.8:1 in times of conflict, it provides an explanation based on Gottman's theory of predictive risks for the stability of [Partner's Names] relationship. Finally, it offers a series of clinical observations about the couple's ability to 'Accept the Influence' of the other and how their positive interactions act (or not) as a buffer system in the face of conflict. Make sure the tone is professional, empathetic, and based strictly on the clinical evidence collected in this record [Duration of record, e.g. 7 days].